Brendon McCullum detested the term Bazball from its inception, viewing it as overly simplistic and perhaps foreseeing how it could be used as a weapon in the future. Right now, trailing 2-0 in an away Ashes series that started with great expectations, it has become the butt of mockery from Australia.
But McCullum has contributed to the problem either. Following the gut-wrenching loss at the Gabba, his claim that, if there was an issue, England were 'too prepared' before the day-night Test was akin to attempting to extinguish a rubbish fire with petrol. It risks becoming his lasting legacy as national coach if results do not take an upturn.
On one level, you almost have to admire his dedication to the philosophy. While McCullum claims to block out external noise, he will have been all too aware of an England team often described as freewheeling and underprepared.
The reality, as always, is more nuanced. England play as much golf during their scheduled breaks as their rivals and they practice equally hard. Before the Gabba Test, they did more, completing five days to Australia's three, due to their limited experience to the pink ball and the different seeing conditions.
McCullum's point about being "excessively ready" was that those additional training days were his decision – the moment he wavered in his belief that minimal preparation is best. It suggested a significant amount of mental energy was used up before they even stepped out in the cauldron of Australia's stronghold. While net practice are a chance to iron out skills, they can also become a comfort zone; low-pressure work that mainly keeps the reflexes sharp.
Schedules are tight such that pre-series state games were not possible (with uncertain value, when you consider England playing three before the whitewash in 2013-14). What is harder to square is the disregard of county championship cricket as a valuable experience more broadly, evidenced by Jacob Bethell's unproductive season.
Match practice alone prepares cricketers for the many situations they walk out to face, and it is here where England have thus far been found lacking. The issue is not just with the bat – harrowing as some of the shot selection has been – but an attack that seems leaderless. None has demonstrated the persistence or control that the exceptional Australian paceman and his support cast have delivered.
McCullum's free-spirit outlook was liberating during its first 12 months, an excellent, apt remedy to shake off the lethargy that came before. The disappointment now stems from how it has seemingly failed to move beyond that initial phase – an absence of an upgrade to the initial philosophy that has seen form taper off to 14 wins and 14 losses from their last 30 Tests.
One such player is Jamie Smith, a gifted player, undoubtedly, but one who is being constantly tested on both edges and has dropped two crucial opportunities with the gloves. The situation is not aided when your opposite number, the Australian keeper, has just delivered a virtuoso performance.
Based on the coach's words after the match, England look likely to keep the faith with Smith in Adelaide. The expectation – as is the case – is that a return to a more familiar match environment triggers his top form, with Perth's trampoline surface and the unusual floodlit Test now in the past.
The alternative is to enact the plan discovered during the series win in New Zealand 12 months ago by shifting Ollie Pope down to his more natural home as a active No. 5 or 6, handing him the wicketkeeping duties, and selecting a fresh face at first drop. Bethell scored runs for the Lions over the weekend, or perhaps Will Jacks could fulfil a similar role to Moeen Ali in 2023.
Ultimately, none of this is ideal, however Australia's superior basics having destroyed pre-series optimism and forced the team's entire approach into the spotlight.
Lena is an environmental scientist and tech enthusiast passionate about advancing sustainable energy solutions through research and writing.