Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?
If not, the reason might be your gender.
Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.
Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.
The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.
Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.
In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.
Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.
A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.
"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.
Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease significantly.
The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.
Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.
"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."
She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."
Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.
"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.
These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.
The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.
According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."
Lena is an environmental scientist and tech enthusiast passionate about advancing sustainable energy solutions through research and writing.